Who is the rider on a white
horse after the first seal is opened in Revelation 6?
Revelation 6:2 [And
I saw a white horse, and he who was seated on it had a bow; and there was given
to him a crown: and he went out with power to overcome.]
He is the Deceiver, the
rider on a white horse. However is he anti-Christ? I don’t think so. Anti-Christ
will appear in Revelation Chapter 13. (Please refer to the appendix for details).
When Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. His position on Revelation 6:2 is
confirmed. After the 1st seal is opened. Mankind entered the
beginning of birth pains.
Revelation Chapter 6
---White Horse is the great Deceiver, but is not Anti-Christ or May or May not
anti-Christ;
Revelation Chapter 13---
Anti-Christ reveals himself here;
Revelation Chapter
19---White Horse Jesus Christ
(In line with [ Luke 21:8 And he said, Take care that you are not tricked: for a number
of people will come in my name, saying, I am he; and, The time is near: do not
go after them.] and [Matthew 24:4-5 And Jesus said to them in answer,
Take care that you are not tricked.
For people will come in my name, saying, I am the Christ; and a number
will be turned from the true way through them.]
When people mention “SECOND COMING”, we all know that it
means Jesus Christ. However, there is another
person named by NEWSWEEK as “THE SECOND COMING”, which refers to Obama.
He was elected president of
the United States in 2008. And successfully re-elected in 2012. He received the Nobel Peace Prize from the
Nobel Committee in Oct 9, 2009. This white horse had a crown of peace, holding a
deceitful bow in his hand, he deceived the people of the earth with false
peace.
No US president has ever
bowed to a Saudi King. Obama never bowed to the Queen of England. Miss Manners “ Americans do not bow to foreign monarchs because that act
signified the monarch’s power over his subjects. When
Obama meet the Saudi King, he bow this king.
x
NEWSWEEK NOW SAYS THAT
OBAMA IS ‘THE SECOND COMING’ Newsweek celebrated President Obama's
upcoming inauguration with a "cover" that calls the event "the
second coming," an apparent reference to the return of Jesus Christ...
Although it is now digital,
Newsweek celebrated President Obama’s upcoming
inauguration with a “cover”
that calls the event “the second coming,” an apparent reference to the return of Jesus Christ, The
Blaze reported Friday.
A post at Twitchy called
the cover “creepy,” while The
Blaze described it as “controversial”
and “questionable.” The cover
highlights an article by former editor Evan Thomas, who once compared Obama to
God “Well, we were the good guys in 1984, it felt that
way. It hasn’t felt that way in recent years. So Obama’s had, really, a different task We’re
seen too often as the bad guys. And he – he has a very
different job from – Reagan was all about America, and
you talked about it. Obama is ‘we are above that now.’ We’re not just parochial, we’re not just chauvinistic, we’re not
just provincial. We stand for something – I mean in a
way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God,” he told Chris Matthews in 2009. This is not the first time
Newsweek has used such a theme when portraying Obama.
A COVER IN 2010 CALLED HIM “GOD OF ALL THINGS” AND ANOTHER COVER
USED RELIGIOUS IMAGERY WHEN PRAISING THE PRESIDENT FOR HIS LATEST STAND
SUPPORTING GAY MARRIAGE.
After Obama won
re-election, Newsweek portrayed him as a conqueror dressed in an 18th century
uniform. Twitchy noted that a number of conservatives on Twitter were repulsed
by the cover.
“I don’t tend to get
indignantly offended that easily, but this Newsweek cover is makes me ill,”tweeted Ben Howe.
“The Second Coming? Really? You’ve
got to be kidding me,” another person wrote.
Another Twitter user said
the publication went “full Jim Jones,”
a reference to the cult leader who led his followers to their death by drinking
poison. Twitchy reminded readers that Newsweek was not as nice to George W.
Bush when he was inaugurated in 2005. source – Examiner
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
REFUSES TO EXPLAIN TO CONGRESS DETAILS OF $1.3 BILLION PAYMENT TO IRAN
by Geoffrey Grider August
23, 2016
The $400 million was part
of a $1.7 billion legal settlement reached with Iran earlier this year.
Congressional inquiries into how this money reached Iran are failing to get
answers. The State and Treasury Departments declined on Tuesday to answer a
series of questions from the Free Beacon about the method in which U.S.
taxpayer funds were paid to Iran.
HE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS
WITHHOLDING FROM CONGRESS DETAILS ABOUT HOW $1.3 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDS
WAS DELIVERED TO IRAN, ACCORDING TO CONVERSATIONS WITH LAWMAKERS WHO SAID THAT
THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOW STONEWALLING AN OFFICIAL INQUIRY INTO THE MATTER.
The Departments of State,
Treasury, and Justice have all rebuffed a congressional probe into the
circumstances surrounding the $1.3 billion payment to Iran, which is part of an
additional $400 million cash payout that occurred just prior to the release of
several U.S. hostages and led to accusations that the administration had paid Iran
a ransom.
The Obama administration
has admitted in recent days that the $400 million cash delivery to Iran was
part of an effort to secure the release of these American hostages, raising
further questions on Capitol Hill about White House efforts to suppress these
details from the public. The $400 million was part of a $1.7 billion legal
settlement reached with Iran earlier this year. Congressional inquiries into
how this money reached Iran are failing to get answers. The State and Treasury
Departments declined on Tuesday to answer a series of questions from the Free
Beacon about the method in which U.S. taxpayer funds were paid to Iran.
The administration is also
withholding key details about the payment from leading members of Congress,
including Sens. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Mike Lee (R., Utah), who launched an
inquiry into the matter earlier this month.
THE DEPARTMENTS OF STATE,
TREASURY, AND JUSTICE ALL FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE INQUIRY BY MONDAY’S DEADLINE, ACCORDING TO CONGRESSIONAL SOURCES TRACKING THE
MATTER.
“The already bizarre circumstances surrounding
the $1.7 billion payment to the Islamic Republic have only gotten stranger in
the weeks since we learned of the $400 million in cash that was sent to the
Iranian regime last January 16th,” Cruz said to the
Free Beacon. “If this payment was, as the Obama
administration insists, a straightforward settlement of an old debt that it
would have cost America more to contest, why all the secrecy?”
The State Department said
it does not know how the remaining $1.3 billion was transferred or to whom it
was transferred. Cruz described this disclosure as “confounding.”
“It is even more confounding that the State
Department spokesman claimed Monday not to know how or to whom the residual
$1.3 billion was transferred, although he does know the transaction happened,” Cruz said. “That kind of money
doesn’t just transfer itself to a rogue regime still
under heavy U.S. sanctions for its sponsorship of terrorism. Someone in our
government must have the answers the American people deserve.”
CRUZ AND LEE ARE SEEKING TO
DETERMINE IF THESE PAYMENTS VIOLATED U.S. LAW. THEY ALSO REQUESTED INFORMATION
ABOUT THE U.S. OFFICIALS WHO NEGOTIATED AND CARRIED OUT THE PAYMENTS.
“While we are deeply concerned about the national
security implications of the administration’s
cash-for-hostages scheme, especially in light of reports that Iran has already
arrested additional Americans, the purpose of this letter is to inquire about
the legality of the payment,” the senators wrote in an
Aug. 12 letter.
“It is imperative that the administration provide
a full accounting of its conduct with respect to the $400 million cash payment
to Iran,” they wrote. “If the
administration violated the law, then Congress and the American people should
be made aware of it so that they can hold the appropriate officials accountable
and take whatever steps necessary to strengthen the law and prevent any
reoccurrence.” While the administration has remained
silent about the circumstances surrounding the payment, investigative reporter
Claudia Rosett recently disclosed that the Treasury Department transferred just
under $1.3 billion to the State Department in 13 “large
identical sums.” The funds, allocated for “foreign claims,” could shine a light
on how the administration moved taxpayer funds into the State Department’s purview in order to provide the additional payment to
Iran.
In 13 individual payments
of $99,999,999.99, the Treasury Department moved a total of 1,299,999,999.87,
which roughly amounts to the remaining money owed to Iran.
source
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.